Vol. I · No. 45

The considered read on the medspa world

ResearchProfessional & trade

Acne Scar Treatments: A Consumer Guide

Explore acne scar treatments like subcision, PRP, microneedling, and dimpleplasty. Learn what research says before your next medspa visit.

By
Ian Gauntt, RN, BSN
Filed under
Research
Published
August 14, 2026
Sources cited
5
Evidence
Tier 2 · Professional & trade
A woman laying on a bed while using a cell phone

Key Takeaways

  • A study in Vietnamese patients (PMID 42539967) found that combining subcision with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) produced measurable improvements in atrophic acne scars, though individual results vary.
  • A prospective study (PMID 42522676) reported short-term efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for 5 MHz fractional microneedle radiofrequency in facial rejuvenation, with outcomes needing longer follow-up.
  • Research (PMID 42522488) suggests dermaroller microneedling may stimulate hair follicles and support hair growth, but evidence quality and long-term data remain limited.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis (PMID 42535096) found that antimicrobial-impregnated sutures were associated with reduced surgical site infections in plastic surgery procedures.
  • Dimpleplasty is a minimally invasive cosmetic procedure with several described surgical techniques; a narrative review (PMID 42528889) highlights the importance of patient selection and provider expertise.

What Is Subcision With PRP and Can It Improve Acne Scars?

Disclaimer: This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before pursuing any cosmetic or medical procedure.


Subcision combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a two-part procedure that physically breaks up the fibrous tissue anchoring depressed acne scars, then floods the treated area with concentrated growth factors to stimulate new collagen. Clinical research shows this combination can meaningfully reduce the depth and appearance of atrophic acne scars, with measurable improvements documented across multiple scar types.

Here is what the evidence actually shows:

  • How subcision works: A clinician inserts a small needle beneath a depressed scar and sweeps it laterally, severing the fibrous bands that tether the skin downward. Releasing that tether allows the skin surface to rise.
  • How PRP is added: The clinician draws a small blood sample, spins it in a centrifuge to concentrate the platelets, then injects or microneedles the resulting plasma into the treated zones. Platelets release growth factors that signal fibroblasts to produce collagen.
  • What a clinical study found: A study examining subcision combined with PRP in patients with atrophic acne scars reported statistically significant reductions in scar severity scores, with patients and clinicians both rating outcomes as improved. The researchers observed that rolling scars responded better than boxcar or icepick types. Most patients required multiple sessions to reach peak results. (PMID 42539967)
  • Scar type matters—a lot. Rolling scars, caused by broad fibrous tethering, are the most mechanically suited to subcision. Icepick scars, which are narrow and deep, respond poorly because the needle cannot effectively reach the base.
  • Sessions and timeline: The same study data indicate that improvements accumulate over several months post-treatment as new collagen matures. Expecting full results after one session is unrealistic.
  • Side effects reported: Bruising, swelling, and temporary skin irregularity are common in the days following the procedure. Serious adverse events were infrequent in the studied cohort. (PMID 42539967)

The combination approach targets two separate problems at once: the mechanical anchor pulling skin down, and the collagen deficit that keeps it thin. Neither subcision alone nor PRP alone addresses both simultaneously. That dual action is the clinical rationale for pairing them.

Results vary. Skin tone, scar depth, individual healing biology, and provider technique all influence outcomes. A board-certified dermatologist or plastic surgeon can assess your specific scar pattern and tell you whether this procedure is a reasonable fit.

How Does Fractional Microneedle Radiofrequency Work for Skin Rejuvenation?

Fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) works by delivering controlled bursts of radiofrequency energy directly into the dermis through a grid of insulated microneedles, triggering a wound-healing response that rebuilds collagen and tightens skin from the inside out. The surface epidermis stays largely intact, which shortens recovery time compared with fully ablative treatments.

Here's what happens during a session:

  • Needle insertion. A handpiece studded with fine, insulated needles penetrates to a preset depth — typically within the mid-to-deep dermis — so the radiofrequency current discharges at the target tissue rather than at the skin surface.
  • Thermal injury zones. The current generates heat at each needle tip, creating discrete columns of controlled thermal damage. Surrounding tissue stays unaffected, which is the "fractional" part of the name.
  • Collagen remodeling cascade. Heat triggers fibroblasts — the cells that manufacture structural proteins — to produce new collagen and elastin. This remodeling continues for weeks to months after the procedure itself.

A prospective study published in 2025 evaluated 5 MHz FMR specifically for facial rejuvenation and found short-term efficacy data supporting improvements in skin texture, pore size, and overall firmness after a short treatment course. The same prospective study tracked safety outcomes and reported the treatment was well-tolerated, with adverse events that were transient and mild.

FMR differs mechanistically from standard microneedling alone in several ways:

| Feature | Standard microneedling | Fractional microneedle RF | |---|---|---| | Primary stimulus | Mechanical micro-injury | Mechanical + thermal energy | | Depth of effect | Superficial-to-mid dermis | Tunable mid-to-deep dermis | | Collagen stimulus | Wound healing only | Wound healing + heat-induced fibroblast activation | | Downtime | Minimal | Minimal to moderate |

The insulated needle design matters. Because the shaft of each needle is coated, radiofrequency energy releases only at the tip. Skin surface heating stays low. That separation between entry point and energy delivery allows providers to treat deeper tissue layers without burning the outer skin.

Results take time. Collagen synthesis unfolds gradually — most patients see progressive improvement over three to six months as remodeling matures, according to the prospective study. Multiple sessions are typically recommended to build on each round of collagen stimulus.


This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Individual results vary. Consult a licensed healthcare provider or board-certified dermatologist before pursuing any aesthetic procedure.

Can Microneedling Really Stimulate Hair Growth?

Microneedling can stimulate hair growth, and clinical research supports its use — particularly when combined with other treatments like minoxidil or platelet-rich plasma. Used alone, it produces modest but measurable results; paired with proven hair-loss therapies, the evidence for meaningful regrowth gets considerably stronger.

The mechanism is straightforward. A dermaroller or automated pen device creates thousands of micro-injuries in the scalp, triggering a wound-healing cascade that releases growth factors — including platelet-derived growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor — which researchers believe activate dormant hair follicles and extend the anagen (active growth) phase. A dedicated review of dermaroller studies confirms this biological pathway and documents hair follicle stimulation across multiple trials.

Key findings from the research:

  • Needle depth matters. Studies examining scalp microneedling generally use depths between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm, with shallower passes stimulating the epidermis and deeper passes reaching the dermal papilla, where follicle activity is actually regulated. The dermaroller review identifies this depth range as the clinically relevant window for follicle stimulation.
  • Combination therapy outperforms monotherapy. Microneedling paired with minoxidil consistently outperforms minoxidil alone in hair count and thickness measurements. Microneedling increases scalp permeability, allowing topical agents to penetrate more effectively right after a session.
  • Androgenetic alopecia responds best. Pattern hair loss in both men and women dominates the positive trial data. Evidence for alopecia areata exists but is thinner. Scarring alopecias — where follicles are permanently destroyed — show little response, because no dormant follicle remains to activate.
  • Results take time. Most trials measure outcomes at 12 to 24 weeks. Visible density changes rarely appear before week eight, and patients who stop treatment early often report regression.

Radiofrequency microneedling — which adds thermal energy through the needles — is a related but distinct technology studied primarily for skin tightening and texture. A prospective safety and efficacy study on 5 MHz fractional microneedle radiofrequency (source) documents its facial rejuvenation outcomes, though scalp hair-growth data for RF microneedling specifically remains limited compared to standard mechanical devices.

Microneedling is a legitimate adjunct for hair loss, not a standalone cure. It works best as part of a broader treatment plan, and the results depend heavily on the type and stage of hair loss involved.


This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Consult a licensed healthcare provider before starting any hair-loss treatment.

What Is Dimpleplasty and Who Is It For?

Dimpleplasty is a minor outpatient surgical procedure that creates permanent cheek dimples by forming a controlled adhesion between the skin and the underlying facial muscle. Healthy adults who want dimples they were not born with are the primary candidates, and the procedure can also recreate dimples lost to aging or weight changes.

The surgeon targets the zygomaticus major muscle — the muscle that pulls the corner of your mouth upward when you smile. A small incision inside the mouth allows the surgeon to remove a tiny core of tissue, then place a suture that tethers the skin to the muscle. When that suture matures into a fibrous scar band, it creates the characteristic skin indentation. According to a 2025 narrative review on dimpleplasty, this fibrous adhesion is what makes the result durable rather than temporary.

Who is a realistic candidate?

  • Adults in good general health with no active oral infections or clotting disorders
  • People who want dimples on one or both cheeks, or who want to restore a dimple that has faded
  • Individuals with realistic expectations — the dimple is visible at rest early on, then typically becomes visible mainly during smiling as the tissue settles, per the 2025 narrative review
  • People who understand that placement is permanent; repositioning requires a second procedure

What the evidence says about durability

Results are considered long-lasting. The 2025 narrative review describes the fibrous band as a stable structural change rather than a filler or injectable that the body reabsorbs. Fillers migrate or dissolve; a mature scar band does not. The same source notes that early postoperative dimples appear even without smiling, then gradually become expression-dependent — a normal part of healing, not a complication.

What it does not do

Dimpleplasty does not slim the face, lift sagging tissue, or address skin texture. Patients seeking those outcomes need different treatments entirely. The procedure is narrow in scope. That narrowness is a feature: surgeons can place the dimple with precision, and the anatomy involved is well-mapped.

Complication rates reported in the literature are low when a trained provider performs the procedure, though risks include asymmetry, infection, and scarring inside the mouth, as outlined in the 2025 narrative review.


This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Consult a qualified, licensed healthcare professional before pursuing any cosmetic or surgical procedure.

How Do Providers Keep Aesthetic Procedures Safe?

Providers keep aesthetic procedures safe primarily through rigorous patient screening, standardized technique protocols, and infection-control practices — and the research shows these steps directly shape both complication rates and treatment outcomes.

Patient selection comes first. Before any device touches skin, a qualified provider reviews medical history, skin type, and contraindications. This step isn't bureaucratic box-checking — it determines whether a given treatment is appropriate at all. A prospective study on fractional microneedle radiofrequency found that careful pre-treatment screening and standardized energy parameters produced a strong safety profile across participants, with adverse events limited to transient redness and mild swelling that resolved quickly (prospective RF microneedling study).

Technique precision matters just as much as equipment. When providers combine subcision with platelet-rich plasma for atrophic acne scars, outcomes depend heavily on the provider's execution of each step in sequence. A clinical study in Vietnamese patients showed that practitioners following a defined protocol — correct needle depth, proper PRP preparation, consistent timing — achieved measurable scar improvement with a manageable side-effect profile (subcision + PRP outcomes study). Sloppy technique erases those gains fast.

Infection control is non-negotiable. Medspa environments introduce real contamination risks, and providers address them through several overlapping layers:

  • Sterile single-use consumables — needles, cartridges, and applicator tips used once and discarded
  • Surface and equipment disinfection between every patient
  • Antimicrobial suture materials in procedures that involve incisions; a systematic review and meta-analysis found that antimicrobial-impregnated sutures significantly reduced surgical site infection rates in plastic surgery settings (antimicrobial suture meta-analysis)
  • Operator hand hygiene and glove protocols throughout the procedure

Dimpleplasty — a minor surgical cosmetic procedure — illustrates how even low-complexity interventions require structured safety steps. A narrative review on the technique emphasized that provider training, anatomical knowledge, and post-procedure wound care instructions all contribute to reducing complications like asymmetry, infection, and scarring (dimpleplasty narrative review).

Post-procedure monitoring closes the loop. Safe providers don't hand patients a pamphlet and send them home. They establish clear follow-up checkpoints, give specific written aftercare instructions, and tell patients exactly which symptoms warrant an urgent call. That communication chain — provider to patient and back — is where many complications get caught early, before they escalate.


This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Consult a licensed healthcare professional before pursuing any aesthetic or cosmetic procedure.

FAQ

Is subcision combined with PRP safe for treating atrophic acne scars?

A study published in Skin Health and Disease (PMID 42539967) reported treatment outcomes for subcision combined with PRP in Vietnamese patients with atrophic acne scars, noting improvements in scar appearance. However, safety and effectiveness can vary by individual, skin type, and provider skill. Always consult a qualified dermatologist or plastic surgeon before pursuing this treatment. This is not medical advice.

What should I expect from fractional microneedle radiofrequency treatments?

A prospective study (PMID 42522676) evaluated 5 MHz fractional microneedle radiofrequency for facial rejuvenation and found short-term improvements with an acceptable safety profile. Side effects, downtime, and results differ among individuals. Speak with a licensed provider to understand whether this technology is appropriate for your skin concerns. This is not medical advice.

Does microneedling with a dermaroller actually help with hair loss?

Research published in Dermatology Online Journal (PMID 42522488) reviewed the role of dermaroller microneedling in hair follicle stimulation and found supportive evidence for its use in promoting hair growth. The quality of evidence and long-term outcomes still need further study. A dermatologist can help determine whether microneedling is a suitable option for your specific type of hair loss. This is not medical advice.

What is dimpleplasty and how is it performed?

Dimpleplasty is a minimally invasive cosmetic procedure designed to create the appearance of natural cheek dimples. A narrative review in the Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery (PMID 42528889) described multiple surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, and potential complications. Results depend heavily on provider experience and individual anatomy. Consult a board-certified surgeon for personalized guidance. This is not medical advice.

How do medspa and plastic surgery providers reduce infection risk during procedures?

A systematic review and meta-analysis (PMID 42535096) found that antimicrobial-impregnated sutures were associated with lower rates of surgical site infections in plastic surgery. Providers may also use advanced sterilization methods for equipment. Ask your provider about their specific infection-control protocols before any procedure. This is not medical advice.

Are the results from these aesthetic procedures guaranteed?

No aesthetic or cosmetic procedure guarantees specific outcomes. Results depend on many factors including individual biology, skin condition, provider technique, and aftercare. The studies referenced in this guide report group-level findings that may not apply to every patient. Always discuss realistic expectations with a qualified healthcare professional before proceeding. This is not medical advice.

This article is for general information and is not medical advice. Aesthetic treatment results vary by individual -- consult a licensed, qualified provider before pursuing any cosmetic procedure.

Sources

  1. T
  2. T
  3. T
  4. T
  5. T

How we tier evidence →

No corrections to date · Report an error

MedSpa Daily is an editorial publication, not a medical provider. Nothing here is medical advice — consult a licensed clinician about your own care.

← Return to today's edition